4.3 Article

Genetic polymorphisms in peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ are associated with Type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity in the Korean population

期刊

DIABETIC MEDICINE
卷 22, 期 9, 页码 1161-1166

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01599.x

关键词

Korean; obesity; peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma; polymorphism; Type 2 diabetes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims We examined whether the common polymorphisms of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPAR gamma) gene are associated with Type 2 diabetes or obesity in the Korean population. Methods We genotyped two common PPAR gamma polymorphisms (Pro12Ala and 161C > T) and examined their association with the clinical phenotypes found in 684 patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus and 291 non-diabetic control subjects. Results The 12Ala allele was less frequent in the Type 2 diabetic patients than in the non-diabetic control subjects (0.036 vs. 0.053, P = 0.024). The allele frequencies of the 161C > T polymorphism did not differ between the control and Type 2 diabetic group (0.158 vs. 0.173). In the non-diabetic controls, those with the T allele had lower BMI and fasting serum triglyceride (TG) concentrations than those with the C/C homozygote (22.7 +/- 2.9 vs. 23.8 +/- 3.2 kg/m(2), P = 0.002; 1.45 +/- 0.81 vs. 1.65 +/- 0.83 mmol/l, P = 0.03, respectively). The 12Ala-161T haplotype was associated with a decreased risk for Type 2 diabetes (OR = 0.47, P = 0.009), whereas the 12Pro-161T haplotype was associated with lower BMI and lower fasting serum TG (22.5 +/- 2.8 vs. 23.7 +/- 3.2 kg/m(2), P = 0.004; 1.41 +/- 0.87 vs. 1.64 +/- 0.79 mmol/l, P = 0.02, respectively). Conclusions The PPAR gamma 12Ala allele was associated with a reduced risk of Type 2 diabetes, whereas the PPAR gamma 161T allele was associated with lower BMI and fasting serum TG concentrations in the Korean subjects. The subjects with 12Ala-161T haplotypes had a reduced risk of Type 2 diabetes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据