4.5 Article

Application of Alamar blue/5-carboxyfluorescein diacetate acetoxymethyl ester as a noninvasive cell viability assay in primary hepatocytes from rainbow trout

期刊

ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 344, 期 1, 页码 76-85

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2005.06.009

关键词

primary rainbow trout hepatocytes; cell culture; cell viability; gene expression; toxicity; fluorescent indicator dyes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have adopted the application of two fluorescent indicator dyes to studying the viability of monolayers of primary rainbow trout hepatocytes. The two fluorescent dyes-Alamar blue, which indicates metabolic activity of a cell, and 5-carboxyfluorescein diacetate acetoxymethyl ester (CFDA-AM), which is an indirect measure of cell membrane integrity-are noninvasive and can be monitored conveniently directly in multiwell plates. According to these dyes, L-15 culture medium supported hepatocyte viability over 96 It more stably than did M199. The two dyes proved to be capable of detecting a concentration-dependent toxic insult to hepatocytes caused by the model compound, pentachlorophenol. In contrast, a lack of impact on cell viability was indicated for up to 10(-5) M 17 beta-estradiol, and that observation was supported by the induction of vitellogenin (VTG) mRNA/protein as indicator of hepatocyte-differentiated function. Application of the Alamar blue/CFDA-AM for 30 min did not alter gene expression either specifically as reflected by VTG or generally as reflected by a random selection of gene sequences that were amplified by differential display reverse transcription PCR (dd-rt-PCR). Thus, the assay represents a resource-efficient way of integrating measures of cell viability and gene expression that should aid in the interpretation of in vitro results. The assay can be applied repeatedly to the same set of cells and can be performed just prior to analysis of gene expression. (C) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据