4.6 Article

Influence of forest management on the species richness and composition of wood-inhabiting basidiomycetes in Swiss forests

期刊

BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION
卷 14, 期 10, 页码 2419-2435

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-004-0151-z

关键词

basidiomycetes; biodiversity; dead wood; forestry; fungi; woody debris

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to investigate the diversity of wood- inhabiting aphyllophoroid basidiomycetes in Swiss forests, 86 plots of 50 m(2) were established. They harboured a total of 3339 samples of woody debris, classified according to three categories ( coarse,. ne, and very. ne woody debris), yielding 238 species of wood- inhabiting fungi. The selected sites cover the main forest types of Switzerland and various degrees of management intensity. A multiple linear regression analysis showed that substrate variation, i. e. differences in the quality of dead wood, including volume, age, degree of decomposition and host tree species, are the most important factors influencing diversity of wood- inhabiting fungi. In addition, a Principle Coordinate Analysis highlighted differences in the fungal communities in the different forest types. The greatest fungal species richness is found on thermophilic deciduous tree and woody shrub species. Fine and very. ne woody debris, even present in intensively managed forests, often serve as important refuges for many species. Forests with a recent management intervention were found to be either species poor or species rich. Possible reasons for these differences may lay in forest size and landscape fragmentation, the distance to the nearest species pool or microclimatic factors. In Switzerland intensively managed forests harbour significantly less wood- inhabiting, aphyllophoroid fungi than non- managed or extensively managed forests. This is the case in both deciduous forests and in conifer forests. However, occasionally intensively managed forest will also harbour rare and endangered species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据