4.5 Article

Isolation and characterization of estuarine dissolved organic matter:: Comparison of ultrafiltration and C18 solid-phase extraction techniques

期刊

MARINE CHEMISTRY
卷 96, 期 3-4, 页码 219-235

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.marchem.2005.01.003

关键词

dissolved organic matter; ultrafiltration; C-18 extraction; characterization; mass spectrometry; FTIR spectroscopy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Characterization of dissolved organic matter (DOM) from aquatic environments has always been constrained by the ability to obtain a representative fraction of the DOM pool for analysis. Ultrafiltration or extraction, commonly using XAD or C-18 sorbents, is therefore generally used to concentrate and desalt DOM samples for further analyses. In this study, we compared ultrafiltration and Cis solid-phase extraction disks (SPE) as DOM isolation methods for estuarine samples. We also evaluated the use of the C-18 SPE disks to isolate low-molecular-weight DOM (LMW-DOM) in the filtrate from ultrafiltration. The isolates from both methods and the LMW-DOM C-18-extracts were characterized using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and direct temperature-resolved mass spectrometry (DT-MS). Based on mass balance and blank measurements, we found that the Cis SPE disks can be used to isolate bulk DOM and LMW-DOM from estuarine samples. FTIR and DT-MS analysis show that C I g-extracted DOM and ultrafiltered high-molecular-weight DOM (HMW-DOM) differ markedly in chemical composition. The HMW-DOM is enriched in (degraded) polysaccharides along with aminosugars when compared with the C-18-extracted DOM. The C-18-extracted DOM appears enriched in aromatic compounds, probably from lignin and/or aromatic amino acids in proteins. C-18 SPE of LMW-DOM samples from ultrafiltration increases the recovery of DOM from the total sample up to about 70%, compared to around 50% using ultrafiltration alone. Thus, a majority of the DOM can be isolated from estuarine samples by a combination of these techniques. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据