4.8 Article

Magnetic resonance spectroscopy reveals that activated monocytes contribute to neuronal injury in SIV neuroAIDS

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 115, 期 9, 页码 2534-2545

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI22953

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR13214, K26 RR000168, P41 RR014075, RR00168, P51 RR000168, RR000150, K01 RR000150, RR16001, RR14075, R24 RR016001] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [P30 AI050409, 2P30-AI-50409] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIMH NIH HHS [P50 MH045294] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NINDS NIH HHS [NS0050041, R01 NS034626, R01 NS050041, NS34626, R01 NS040237, NS40237] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Difficulties in understanding the mechanisms of HIV neuropathogenesis include the inability to study dynamic processes of infection, cumulative effects of the virus, and contributing host immune responses. We used H-1 magnetic resonance spectroscopy and studied monocyte activation and progression of CNS neuronal injury in a CD8 lymphocyte depletion model of neuroAIDS in SIV-infected rhesus macaque monkeys. We found early, consistent neuronal injury coincident with viremia and SIV infection/activation of monocyte subsets and sought to define the role of plasma virus and monocytes in contributing to CNS disease. Antiretroviral therapy with essentially non-CNS-penetrating agents resulted in slightly decreased levels of plasma virus, a significant reduction in the number of activated and infected monocytes, and rapid, near-complete reversal of neuronal injury. Robust macrophage accumulation and productive virus replication were found in brains of infected and CD8 lymphocyte-depleted animals, but no detectable virus and few scattered infiltrating macrophages were observed in CD8 lymphocyte-depleted animals compared with animals not receiving antiretroviruses that were sacrificed at the same time after infection. These results underscore the role of activated monocytes and monocyte infection outside of the brain in driving CNS disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据