4.5 Article

Bazedoxifene acetate: A selective estrogen receptor modulator with improved selectivity

期刊

ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 146, 期 9, 页码 3999-4008

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/en.2005-0030

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We assessed the preclinical characteristics of a novel, stringently screened selective estrogen receptor modulator, bazedoxifene acetate, including its ability to bind to and activate estrogen receptors and promote increased bone mineral density and bone strength in rats, and the effects impacting the uterine endometrium, breast cancer cell proliferation, and central nervous system-associated vasomotor responses in an animal model. Bazedoxifene bound to estrogen receptor-alpha with an IC50 of 26 nM, an affinity similar to that of raloxifene. Bazedoxifene did not stimulate proliferation of MCF-7 cells but did inhibit 17 beta-estradiol-induced proliferation with an IC50 of 0.19 nM. In an immature rat uterine model, bazedoxifene (0.5 and 5.0 mg/kg) was associated with less increase in uterine wet weight than either ethinyl estradiol (10 mu g/kg) or raloxifene ( 0.5 and 5.0 mg/kg). Histological analysis revealed that coadministration of bazedoxifene also appeared to reduce raloxifene-stimulated endometrial luminal epithelial cell and myometrial cell hypertrophy. In ovariectomized rats, bazedoxifene was associated with significant increases in bone mineral density at 6 wk, compared with control, and better compressive strength of bone samples from the L4 vertebrae, compared with samples from ovariectomized animals. In the morphine-addicted rat model of vasomotor activity, bone-sparing doses of bazedoxifene alone were not associated with 17 beta-estradiol inhibition of increased vasomotor activity. Bazedoxifene acetate represents a promising new treatment for osteoporosis, with a potential for less uterine and vasomotor effects than selective estrogen receptor modulators currently used in clinical practice. Controlled clinical trial data will be needed to confirm these effects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据