4.7 Article

Induction of autoantibodies to syngeneic prostate-specific membrane antigen by xenogeneic vaccination

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 116, 期 3, 页码 415-421

出版社

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.21014

关键词

prostate cancer; PSMA; DNA vaccines; autoantibodies; immune therapy

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P50 CA092629-02, P50 CA092629] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [P50 DK92629, DK47650] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a prototypical differentiation antigen expressed on normal and neoplastic prostate epithelial cells, and on the neovasculature of many solid tumors. Monoclonal antibodies specific for PSMA are in development as therapeutic agents. Methodologies to actively immunize against PSMA may be limited by immunologic ignorance and/or tolerance that restrict the response to self-antigens. Our studies have previously shown that xenogeneic immunization with DNA vaccines encoding melanosomal differentiation antigens induces immunity in a mouse melanoma model. Here we apply this approach to PSMA to establish proof of principle in a mouse model. Immunization with xenogeneic human PSMA protein or DNA induced antibodies to both human and mouse PSMA in mice. Monoclonal antibodies specific for mouse PSMA were generated to analyze antibody isotypes and specificity for native and denatured PSMA at the clonal level. Most antibodies recognized denatured PSMA, but C57BL/6 mice immunized with xenogeneic PSMA DNA followed by a final boost with xenogeneic PSMA protein yielded autoantibodies that reacted with native folded mouse PSMA. Monoclonal antibodies were used to confirm the expression of PSMA protein in normal mouse kidney. These results establish the basis for clinical trials to test PSMA DNA vaccines in patients with solid tumors that either express PSMA directly or that depend on normal endothelial cells expressing PSMA for their continued growth. (C) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据