4.4 Article

Aflatoxin M1 in milk powders:: Processing, homogeneity and stability testing of certified reference materials

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02652030500166537

关键词

aflatoxin M-1; mycotoxin; homogeneity; stability; milk powder; certified reference material (CRM)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As part of the certification campaign of three candidate reference materials for the determination of aflatoxin M-1 (AfM(1)) in whole milk powders, homogeneity, short- and long-term stability tests of naturally contaminated milk powders have been performed. The homogeneity of two AfM(1) contaminated milk powders was studied by taking samples at regular intervals of the filling sequences and analysing in triplicate for their AfM1 contents by liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection (LC-FLD) using random stratified sampling schemes. The homogeneity testing of an AfM(1) 'blank' milk powder material was performed by determining the nitrogen content because AfM(1) levels were below the limit of detection of the most sensitive determination method. The short- term stability of AfM(1)-contaminated milk powders was evaluated at three different storage temperatures (4, 18 and 40 degrees C). After storage times of 0, 1, 2 and 4 weeks, samples were investigated using LC-FLD. The long-term stability study comprised of measurements after 0, 6, 12 and 18 months after storage at -20 and 48 degrees C. Analyses were done by LC-FLD. Based on the homogeneity tests, the materials were sufficiently homogenous to serve as certified reference materials. Corresponding uncertainty contributions of 0.23-0.89% were calculated for the homogeneity. The stability measurements showed no significant trends for both short- and long-term stability studies. The long-term stability uncertainties of the AfM(1)-contaminated milk powders were 7.4 and 6.3%, respectively, for a shelf-life of 6 years and storage at -20 degrees C. Supplementary stability monitoring schemes over a long period of several years are currently ongoing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据