4.7 Article

Association between serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and gingival inflammation

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
卷 82, 期 3, 页码 575-580

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/82.3.575

关键词

25-hydroxyvitamin D; inflammatory disease; gingivitis; periodontal disease

资金

  1. NIDCR NIH HHS [K24DE00419, U54DE14264] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Vitamin D has been shown to have immunomodulatory effects in in vitro and in animal studies. However, data from clinical studies of inflammatory diseases are scarce. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] and gingival inflammation. Design: We analyzed data from 77 503 gingival units (teeth) in 6700 never smokers aged 13 to > 90 y from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Multiple logistic regression models adjusted for subject- and site-specific covariates included age, sex, race-ethnicity, income, body mass index, diabetes, use of oral contraceptives and hormone replacement therapy among women, intake of vitamin C. missing teeth, full crown coverage, presence of calculus, frequency of dental visits, and dental examiner and survey phase. Generalized estimating equations were used to account for correlated observations within subjects. Results: Compared with sites in subjects in the lowest 25(OH)D quintile. sites in Subjects in the highest 25(OH)D quintile were 20% (95% CI: 8%. 31%) less likely to bleed on gingival probing (P for trend < 0.001). The association appeared to be linear over the entire 25(OH)D range. was consistent across racial or ethnic groups, and was similar among men and women as well as among users and nonusers of vitamin and mineral supplements. Conclusions: Vitamin D may reduce susceptibility to gingival inflamination through its anti inflammatory effects. Gingivitis may be a useful clinical model to evaluate the antinflammatory effects, of vitamin D.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据