4.4 Article

Measuring gene flow in the cultivation of transgenic cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 31, 期 1, 页码 11-20

出版社

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1385/MB:31:1:011

关键词

transgenic cotton; pollen dispersal; Bt gene; tfd A gene; biosafety; transgene

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transgenic Bt cotton NewCott 33B and transgenic tfd A cotton TFD were chosen to evaluate pollen dispersal frequency and distance of transgenic cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) in the Huanghe Valley Cotton-producing Zone, China. The objective was to evaluate the efficacy of biosafety procedures used to reduce pollen movement. A field test plot of transgenic cotton (6 x 6 m) was planted in the middle of a nontransgenic field measuring 2 10 x 210 m. The results indicated that the pollen of Bt cotton or tfd A cotton could be dispersed into the environment. Out-crossing was highest within the central test plot where progeny from nontransgenic plants, immediately adjacent to transgenic plants, had resistant plant progeny at frequencies up to 10.48%. Dispersal frequency decreased significantly and exponentially as dispersal distance increased. The flow frequency and distance of tfd A and Bt genes were similar, but the pollen-mediated gene flow of tfd A cotton was higher and further to the transgenic block than that of Bt cotton (x(2) = 11.712, 1 degree of freedom, p < 0.001). For the tfd A gene, out-crossing ranged from 10.13% at I m to 0.04% at 50 m from the transgenic plants. For the Bt gene, out-crossing ranged from 8.16% at I m to 0.08% at 20 m from the transgenic plants. These data were fit to a power curve model: y = 10.132 1x(-1.4133) with a correlation coefficient of 0.999, and y = 8.0031x(-1.483) with a correlation coefficient of 0.998, respectively. In this experiment, the farthest distance of pollen dispersal from transgenic cotton was 50 m. These results indicate that a 60-m buffer zone would serve to limit dispersal of transgenic pollen from small-scale field tests.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据