4.7 Article Retracted Publication

被撤回的出版物: Synergistic interactions between MEK1/2 and histone deacetylase inhibitors in BCR/ABL plus human leukemia cells (Retracted article. See vol. 30, pg. 1452, 2016)

期刊

LEUKEMIA
卷 19, 期 9, 页码 1579-1589

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2403868

关键词

leukemia; histone deacetylase inhibitors; MEK1/2 inhibitors; p21(CIP1)

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA72955, CA63753, CA 100866, CA88906, CA93738] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Interactions between the histone deacetylase inhibitor SAHA and the pharmacologic MEK1/2 inhibitor PD184352 were examined in Bcr/Abl+ human leukemia cells. Coadministration of minimally toxic concentrations of SAHA ( or sodium butyrate) and PD184352 ( or U0126) resulted in a synergistic increase in mitochondrial damage, caspase activation, and apoptosis in K562 and LAMA 84 cells. Similar interactions were observed in CD34(+) cells from two patients with CML and in imatinib mesylate-resistant K562 cells but not in normal human CD34(+) bone marrow cells. These events were associated with a marked increase in ROS generation, inactivation of ERK and Akt, downregulation of p21(CIP1), Bcr/Abl, and cyclin D-1, and activation of JNK. Of these events, ROS generation, ERK inactivation, and cytochrome c/AIF release were largely caspase-independent, whereas the other phenomena displayed varying degrees of caspase-dependence. Using pharmacologic and genetic approaches, generation of ROS, p21(CIP1) downregulation, and inactivation of Akt and MEK were found to play significant functional roles in SAHA/PD184352-mediated lethality, whereas JNK activation and Raf-1 downregulation were determined to represent secondary events. These findings indicate that interruption of the MEK/ERK pathway substantially lowers the threshold for HDAC inhibitor-mediated oxidative injury, mitochondrial dysfunction, and apoptosis, suggesting that this approach warrants further examination in Bcr/Abl+-related malignancies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据