4.6 Article

Neotectonics and channel evolution of the Lower Ivinhema River: A right-bank tributary of the upper Parana River, Brazil

期刊

GEOMORPHOLOGY
卷 70, 期 3-4, 页码 325-338

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.02.011

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The lvinhema River, an important right-bank tributary of the upper Parana River, cuts a series of terraces, geomorphic surfaces, floodplains and associate features. Through terrace mapping, sediment composition, absolute (C-14, TL) dating and morphostructural analysis, this paper presents the composed longitudinal profile and the structural analysis of the lower course of the Ivinhema River. The tectonic model of the study area constitutes a sequence of NW tilting faultblocks formed from antithetic faults that control channel sinuosity, longitudinal profile, floodplain distribution and valley asymmetry. The area began to be structured during the Paleocene with formation of the oligomict conglomerate, probably under an and climate. Another tectonic reactivation in the Mio-Pliocene boundary defined the divides of the Upper Parana and Paraguay River basins, with fort-nation of the polymict conglomerate. An active depositional phase taken place at the Tertiary-Quaternary limit produced the massive reddish clayey sand sediments very common in the area. During the Late Pelistocene (42.5 +/- 1.7 and 31.1 +/- 1.7 ka BP), the Parana and lvinhema rivers constructed a sedimentary sequence of gravelly sand deposits in a braided channel environment. At the beginning of the Holocene a new tectonic pulse, lifted up a group of blocks parallel to the Parana River valley, developed a series of antithetic faults. Tectonic intensity associated with the pluvial stage (Hypsithermal phase between 8 and 6 ka) changed the channel pattern of the river from braided to meandering. Channel evolution during the Late Pleistocene and Holocene was also influenced by climatic changes. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据