4.5 Article

Enhanced caffeine-induced Ca2+ release in the 3xTg-AD mouse model of Alzheimer's disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
卷 94, 期 6, 页码 1711-1718

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03332.x

关键词

Alzheimer's; caffeine; calcium; neuron; presenilin; ryanodine

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG17968, AG26175] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most prevalent form of dementia among the elderly and is a complex disorder that involves altered proteolysis, oxidative stress and disruption of ion homeostasis. Animal models have proven useful in studying the impact of mutant AD-related genes on other cellular signaling pathways, such as Ca2+ signaling. Along these lines, disturbances of intracellular Ca2+ ([Ca2+](i)) homeostasis are an early event in the pathogenesis of AD. Here, we have employed microfluorimetric measurements of [Ca2+](i) to investigate disturbances in Ca2+ homeostasis in primary cortical neurons from a triple transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease (3xTg-AD). Application of caffeine to mutant presenilin-1 knock-in neurons (PS1(KI)) and 3xTg-AD neurons evoked a peak rise of [Ca2+](i) that was significantly greater than those observed in non-transgenic neurons, although all groups had similar decay rates of their Ca2+ transient. This finding suggests that Ca2+ stores are greater in both PS1(KI) and 3xTg-AD neurons as calculated by the integral of the caffeine-induced Ca2+ transient signal. Western blot analysis failed to identify changes in the levels of several Ca2+ binding proteins (SERCA-2B, calbindin, calsenilin and calreticulin) implicated in the pathogenesis of AD. However, ryanodine receptor expression in both PS1(KI) and 3xTg-AD cortex was significantly increased. Our results suggest that the enhanced Ca2+ response to caffeine observed in both PS1(KI) and 3xTg-AD neurons may not be attributable to an alteration of endoplasmic reticulum store size, but to the increased steady-state levels of the ryanodine receptor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据