4.6 Article

Production of cellulase/β-glucosidase by the mixed fungi culture Trichoderma reesei and Aspergillus phoenicis on dairy manure

期刊

PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 40, 期 9, 页码 3087-3094

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2005.03.044

关键词

cellulase; beta-glucosidase; animal manure; Trichoderma reesei; Aspergillus phoenicis; mixed culture

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Trichoderma reesei was co-cultured with Aspergillus phoenicis using dairy manure as a substrate to produce cellulase with a high level of P-glucosidase. For pure cultures of T reesei and A. phoenicis, the optimal media compositions were the same (10 g/L manure supplemented with 2 g/L KH2PO4, 2 mL/L tween-80 and 2 mg/L CoCl2) while the optimal temperature and pH were similar (25.5 degrees C and pH 5.76 for T reesei; 28.2 degrees C and pH 5.14 for A. phoenicis). The mixed culture was therefore completed at 27 degrees C and pH 5.5, which is close to the optimal values for both fungi. The mixed culture resulted in a relatively high level of total cellulase and P-glucosidase. It was also found that a high manure solid concentration (> 20 g/L) resulted in higher enzyme activities, probably due to an alleviation of the nutrients limitation at 10 g/L manure. The P-glucosidase activity and filter paper activity of the mixed fungi culture were 0.64 IU/mL and 1.54 FPU/mL, respectively, corresponding to a ratio of 0.41, which is an ideal ratio for hydrolyzing manure cellulose. To test the effectiveness of the enzymes produced by mixed culture, a crude enzyme broth was used for hydrolyzing the manure cellulose. The glucose concentration produced was significantly (p < 0.01) higher than the glucose obtained when using the commercial enzyme and the enzyme broth of the pure culture T reesei. The results indicate that the mixed culture of T reesei and A. phoenicis is an effective approach to produce a cellulolytic enzyme system for hydrolyzing manure cellulose. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据