4.6 Article

Identification of polymorphisms on the MDR1 gene among Turkish population and their effects on multidrug resistance in acute leukemia patients

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY
卷 80, 期 1, 页码 26-34

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajh.20427

关键词

MDR1; P-glycoprotein; single-nucleotide polymorphism; SNP; acute leukemia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multidrug-resistance (MDR) phenotype is a serious limitation to the effective chemotherapeutic treatment of many cancer types, including leukemia. One of the most important proteins, the over-expression of which is responsible for the multidrug-resistance phenotype in many cancer types, is P-glycoprotein. This protein is the product of the MDR1 gene. In previous studies, single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) C3435T, G2677T, and T-129C in the MDR1 gene were shown to be correlated with lower P-glycoprotein expression in normal tissues. It was suggested that this might have an advantage in cancer chemotherapy by resulting in a low drug-resistance phenotype. The frequencies of these SNPs were studied in 45 acute leukemia patients (25 of which were primary refractory and 20 of which were drug-sensitive) and 17 healthy individuals, forming a Turkish population of 62 individuals. In the first part of the study, these polymorphisms were compared with other populations. Marked differences were apparent between African and Turkish populations for the C3435T polymorphism. On the other hand, similarities were found between other Caucasian/Asian and Turkish populations (P < 0.001). However, for the G2677T polymorphism, the Turkish population is different than Japanese and German populations (P < 0.001). For the T-129C polymorphism, all individuals in the studied population were homozygous for the T/T genotype. In the second part of this study, drug-resistant and drug-sensitive acute leukemia patients were compared for these SNPs. These polymorphisms did not seem to have a significant effect on P-glycoprotein-mediated drug resistance in the patients studied.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据