4.6 Article

The host galaxy/AGN connection in nearby early-type galaxies - Sample selection and hosts brightness profiles

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 440, 期 1, 页码 73-U50

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053113

关键词

galaxies : active; galaxies : bulges; galaxies : elliptical and lenticular, cD; galaxies : nuclei; galaxies : structure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This is the first of a series of three papers exploring the connection between the multiwavelength properties of AGNs in nearby early-type galaxies and the characteristics of their hosts. We selected two samples, both with high resolution 5 GHz VLA observations available and providing measurements down to 1 mJy level, reaching radio-luminosities as low as 10(19) W Hz(-1). We focus on the 116 radio-detected galaxies as to boost the fraction of AGN with respect to a purely optically selected sample. Here we present the analysis of the optical brightness profiles based on archival HST images, available for 65 objects. We separate early-type galaxies on the basis of the slope of their nuclear brightness profiles, into core and power-law galaxies following the Nuker's scheme, rather than on the traditional morphological classification (i.e. into E and S0 galaxies). Our sample of AGN candidates is indistinguishable, when their brightness profiles are concerned, from galaxies of similar optical luminosity but hosting weaker ( or no) radio-sources. We confirm previous findings that relatively bright radio-sources (L-r > 10(21.5) W Hz(-1)) are uniquely associated to core galaxies. However, below this threshold in radio-luminosity core and power- law galaxies coexist and they do not show any apparent difference in their radio-properties. Not surprisingly, since our sample is deliberately biased to favour the inclusion of active galaxies, we found a higher fraction of optically nucleated galaxies. Addressing the multiwavelength properties of these nuclei will be the aim of the two forthcoming papers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据