4.3 Article

Surgical outcomes of oesophagectomy or gastrectomy due to cancer for patients ≥75 years of age: a single-centre cohort study

期刊

ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY
卷 89, 期 3, 页码 228-233

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ans.14761

关键词

gastrectomy; high age; oesophagectomy; post-operative morbidity and mortality

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background The increasing age of the population and prolonged life expectancy result in a widening of age limit criteria for a variety of surgical procedures. Oesophagectomy and total gastrectomy are complex operations associated with significant risks of post-operative complications. Methods This is a single-centre cohort study of patients operated with curative intent due to oesophageal or gastric cancer. Results From 2007 to 2017, 548 patients underwent surgery with curative intent, with 122 patients (22.3%) classified as elderly (>= 75 years). There was no difference in total complication rates between the groups. The adjusted odds ratio for 90-day mortality after oesophageal resection in the elderly group was 3.65 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.33-10.03) and after gastrectomy was 1.62 (95% CI: 0.55-4.79). The adjusted hazard ratio for 1-year mortality after oesophagectomy was 2.29 (95% CI: 1.25-4.19), and after gastrectomy the adjusted hazard ratio was 1.48 (95% CI: 0.75-2.92). In the event of a complication with Clavien-Dindo score IIIb or higher, there was a statistically significant increase of 90-day mortality to over 50% among elderly patients both after oesophagectomy and gastrectomy (50.0% versus 19.8%; P = 0.005 and 57.1% versus 17.4%; P = 0.012, respectively). Conclusion There is a statistically significant increase in 90-day mortality after oesophageal and gastric cancer surgery in elderly compared with younger patients. Post-operative complications with high Clavien-Dindo score in patients undergoing oesophagectomy or gastrectomy, with age >= 75 years, are a dramatic risk factor for post-operative death.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据