4.7 Article

Leukemic transformation of polycythemia vera - A single center study of 23 patients

期刊

CANCER
卷 104, 期 5, 页码 1032-1036

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21297

关键词

acute leukemia; polycythemia vera; essential thrombocythemia; myelofibrosis; chronic myeloproliferative disorders

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND. Acute leukemia (AL) may occur as rare and late event of polycythemia vera (PV). METHODS. The current study included 23 patients who developed acute leukemia in a cohort of 414 consecutive PV patients with long-term observation (3208 person years of follow-up). Kaplan-Meier Product-Limit method was used to estimate the cumulative probability of survival; Gehan-Wilcoxon test was applied to compare survival in different groups of patients. RESULTS. Median age was 68 years, and 18 patients (78%) were > 60 years of age. At diagnosis of AL, most patients had a white blood count > 10 X 10(9)/L (n - 17; 74%), Hgb < 10 g/dL (n 13; 57%), and platelet count > 50 X 10(9)/L (n = 17; 74%). Of 14 patients in whom cytogenetic analysis was available at leukemic transformation, 12 showed high-risk abnormalities including complex karyotype (n = 10), del (7)(q22) sole (n = 1) and del (X)(q26) sole (n = 1), whereas 2 had a normal karyotype. In patients whose karyotype was available at diagnosis of PV, cytogenetic evolution was documented at progression to AL. Treatment consisted of supportive care and/or low-dose chemotherapy (n - 15), or induction chemotherapy (n = 8). This included idarubicin plus cytarabine (n = 3), high-dose cytarabine (n = 4), and fludarabine -based regimen (n = 1). Allogenic stem cell transplantation was offered to a single patient, who is alive at Day + 70. The outcome of patients was poor, with a median survival of 2.9 months (range, 0.6-20.1 mos), with no significant differences between palliation and intensive treatments. CONCLUSIONS. AL following PV has distinct clinical and biologic features. Outcome of patients is poor irrespective of the treatment employed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据