4.3 Article

Socio-economic disadvantage and demographics as factors in stage of colorectal cancer presentation and survival

期刊

ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY
卷 85, 期 3, 页码 135-139

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/ans.12709

关键词

Australia; colorectal cancer; socio-economic status; staging

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is common, and early diagnosis improves outcome. Overseas studies have suggested that low socio-economic status (SES) is related to advanced cancer stage at presentation and reduced survival. The situation in Australia is unclear. This study examines the effect of demographic and SES on CRC stage at presentation and survival in a single tertiary centre. MethodsPatients undergoing surgical resection for CRC (1 January 2005 to 31 December 2010) were identified, and socio-demographic and histopathological information obtained. Four socio-economic indices using 2006 Australian Census data were assigned by residential postcode. Factors contributing to tumour (T) and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage at presentation and survival were assessed. ResultsFive hundred and fifty-seven patients were included. Results did not support a relationship between SES and either advanced stage at presentation or survival. Only one index (economic resources) was related to a more advanced T stage at presentation (P = 0.011); none were related to AJCC stage or survival. No significant relationship was found between an individual's country of birth, language spoken, private insurance or employment status and presenting with a later T or AJCC stage. Age, AJCC and T stage at diagnosis and emergency presentation significantly affected survival on multivariate analysis. ConclusionSES and most demographic factors did not appear to significantly influence CRC stage at presentation and outcome. A focus on obtaining equivalent access to health care both nationally and internationally could prove beneficial in improving outcomes for CRC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据