4.2 Article

Reduced communication channels of molecular fragments and their entropy/information bond indices

期刊

THEORETICAL CHEMISTRY ACCOUNTS
卷 114, 期 1-3, 页码 4-18

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00214-005-0638-z

关键词

chemical bond descriptors; combination rules for entropic bond indices; communication systems; electronic structure theory; entropy/information bond descriptors; information theory; molecular fragments; reduced channels

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A reduction of the molecular communication channel in atomic resolution, which generates the entropy/information indices of the system chemical bonds, is performed by combining several atomic inputs and/or outputs into a single unit representing a collection of bonded atoms. The implications of such fragment-reduced communication channels for gaining both the internal (intra-subsystem) and external (inter-subsystem) bond-indices are examined. The entropy/information quantities of the reduced channels of molecular subsystems are proposed as descriptors of their information bond order and its covalent/ionic composition. These predictions are compared with the bond indices resulting from the molecular orbital ( MO) theory. The rules for combining the subsystem entropy/information data into the corresponding global quantities describing the system as a whole are derived and tested. The so-called complementary reductions are used to formulate the exact combination rules for the molecular entropy/information bond indices. Applications to the three-orbital model and pi-bond systems ( butadiene and benzene) in the Huckel theory approximation are reported and used to illustrate the proposed concepts and techniques. The subsystem bond-order conservation and a competition between its ionic and covalent contributions are discussed. In contrast to the familiar MO bond indices, the entropic descriptors of molecular fragments are shown to exhibit a remarkable degree of equalization, thus emphasizing the information equilibrium of the ground-state distributions of electrons.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据