4.7 Article

Oligodonal CD4+ T cells in the lungs of patients with severe emphysema

出版社

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200410-1332OC

关键词

antigens; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; lymphocytes

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL62410, HL02005, K08 HL089766] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rationale: Within the lungs of patients with severe emphysema, inflammation continues despite smoking cessation. Foci of T lymphocytes in the small airways of patients with emphysema have been associated with disease severity. Whether these T cells play an important role in this continued inflammatory response is unknown. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine if T cells recruited to the lungs of subjects with severe emphysema contain oligoclonal T-cell populations, suggesting their accumulation in response to antigenic stimuli. Methods: Lung T-cell receptor (TCR) V beta repertoire from eight patients with severe emphysema and six control subjects was evaluated at the time of tissue procurement (ex vivo) and after 2 weeks of culture with interleukin 2 (in vitro). Junctional region nucleotide sequencing of expanded TCR-V beta subsets was performed. Results: No significantly expanded TCR-V beta subsets were identified in ex vivo samples. However, T cells grew from all emphysema (n = 8) but from only one of the control lung samples (n = 6) when exposed to interleukin 2 (p = 0.0013). Within the cultured cells, seven major CD4-expressing TCR-V beta subset expansions were identified from five of the patients with emphysema. These expansions were composed of oligoclonal populations of T cells that had already been expanded in vivo. Conclusion: Severe emphysema is associated with inflammation involving T lymphocytes that are composed of oligoclonal CD4(+) T cells. These T cells are accumulating in the lung secondary to conventional antigenic stimulation and are likely involved in the persistent pulmonary inflammation characteristic of severe emphysema.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据