4.6 Article

Regulation of AKT1 expression by beta-catenin/Tcf/Lef signaling in colorectal cancer cells

期刊

CARCINOGENESIS
卷 26, 期 9, 页码 1503-1512

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgi120

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The serine/threonine kinase AKT plays a critical role in controlling the balance between cell survival and apoptosis. Several reports implicated AKT in the molecular pathogenesis of different human malignancies and overexpression of AKT was recently demonstrated to be an early event in colorectal carcinogenesis. We report here the identification of nine putative Tcf/Lef-binding elements (TBEs) upstream to the ATG initiation site of the AKT1 gene. Four of these TBEs are located upstream of the transcriptional start, whereas five TBEs are situated in Exon 1 of the AKT1 gene. Accordingly, we hypothesized that AKT1 expression might be regulated by Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. To elucidate the regulation of AKT expression in colon cancer cells, we generated reporter constructs containing the luciferase gene under the control of different regions derived from the AKT1 promoter/enhancer. Transient expression of the constructs in colorectal cancer (CRC) cell lines resulted in significant activation of the reporter gene. Luciferase was stimulated 20- to 50-fold in SW480, SW948 and HCT116 CRC cells. In contrast, the AKT1 promoter/enhancer constructs showed only a weak response in 293 embryonic kidney cells. Coexpression of a constitutively active beta-catenin mutant in colon cancer cells further enhanced reporter gene activation from the AKT1 promoter/enhancer, whereas it was downregulated by introduction of either wild-type APC or dnTcf-4. In addition, immunohistochemical staining of tumor sections derived from CRC patients showed elevated expression levels of AKT1, correlating with enhanced cytoplasmic/nuclear expression of beta-catenin. In summary our data suggest that beta-catenin/Tcf contributes to the transcriptional regulation of the AKT1 gene.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据