4.6 Article

Endometrial microbial colonization and plasma cell endometritis after spontaneous or indicated preterm versus term delivery

期刊

出版社

MOSBY, INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.02.128

关键词

preterm birth; prematurity; endometritis; infection

资金

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [HD33883] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: This study was undertaken to determine whether endometrial microbial colonization or plasma cell endometritis is increased after spontaneous versus indicated preterm delivery or a spontaneous term delivery. Study design: Postpartum, endometrial specimens were obtained after a spontaneous (mean 83, Infection +/- 17.6 days) or indicated (mean 83, +/- 16.7 days) preterm delivery before 34 weeks' gestation and after a spontaneous term delivery (mean 82, +/- 15.7 days; P = .980). Cultures for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria, Trichomonas vaginalis, and genital mycoplasmas were performed. Histologic endometritis was defined as the presence of plasma cells. Results: The study population (n = 820) was 71% black, 29% white, 69% unmarried, and 31% had less than 12 years of education. Endometrial cultures were positive for at least 1 microorganism in 82% of the women. No significant difference in positive endometrial cultures were observed among women after a spontaneous versus an indicated preterm delivery (85% vs 79%, P = .102), or a spontaneous preterm, versus a spontaneous term delivery (85% vs 81%, P = .123). Plasma cell endometritis was present in 39% of 506 specimens sufficient for histologic examination and was also similar in the three groups (P = .160). Conclusion: Microbial colonization of the endometrium and plasma cell endometritis are similar 3 months after spontaneous or indicated preterm or term births. Therefore, chronic infection and inflammation of the endometrium (documented at 3 months postpartum) do not appear to be risk factors for subsequent delivery in women with a prior spontaneous delivery less than 34 weeks' gestation. (c) 2005 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据