4.5 Article

Altered loading during walking and sit-to-stand is affected by quadriceps weakness after total knee arthroplasty

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH
卷 23, 期 5, 页码 1083-1090

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1016/j.orthres.2005.01.021

关键词

total knee replacement; muscle; compensation; strength; function

资金

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [R01HD041055-01, T32 HD07490] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) successfully reduces pain, but has not achieved comparable improvements in function. We hypothesized that quadriceps strength affects performance by altering loading and movement patterns during functional tasks. Methods: Fourteen subjects with isolated, unilateral TKA were tested three months after surgery. Quadriceps strength was assessed isometrically and kinematics, kinetics, and EMG were collected during level walking and sit-to-stand (STS). Function was assessed using the timed up and go test (TUG), stair climbing test (SCT), and the 6 min walk test (6MW). Results: Functional performance was significantly related to the quadriceps strength of both legs, but was more strongly related to the uninvolved strength (involved rho = -0.43 with TUG; -0.65 with SCT; 0.64 with 6MW) (uninvolved rho = -0.63 with TUG; -0.68 with SCT; 0.77 with 6MW). During STS, subjects shifted weight away from the operated limb (p < 0.01). Quadriceps muscle activity and the extension moments at the knee and hip were smaller in the involved compared to the uninvolved (P < 0.05). The amount of asymmetry in knee excursion during weight acceptance in gait, the asymmetry in weight bearing from sit-to-stand, and the uninvolved hip extension moment during STS were related to the amount of asymmetry in quadriceps strength (rho > 0.56, p < 0.05). Conclusions: Quadriceps weakness in patients with TKA has a substantial impact on the movement patterns and performance of the knee during functionally important tasks. (c) 2005 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据