4.5 Article

One-year follow-up of mild traumatic brain injury:: Post-concussion symptoms, disabilities and life satisfaction in relation to serum levels of S-100B and neurone-specific enolase in acute phase

期刊

JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE
卷 37, 期 5, 页码 300-305

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS AS
DOI: 10.1080/16501970510032910

关键词

traumatic brain injury; head trauma; brain concussion; biochemical marker; S-100 proteins; life satisfaction; post-concussion symptoms

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To investigate, in patients with mild traumatic brain injury, serum concentrations of S-100B and neurone-specific enolase in acute phase and post-concussion symptoms, disabilities and life satisfaction 1 year after the trauma. Design: Prospective study. Patients: Eighty-eight patients (age range 18-87 years). Methods: Blood samples were taken on admission and about 7 hours later. At follow-up 15 4 months later, the patients filled in questionnaires about symptoms (Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms), disability (Rivermead Head Injury Follow-up) and life satisfaction (LiSat-11). Results: Concentrations of S-100B and neurone-specific enolase were regularly increased in the first blood sample. Of the 69 patients participating in the follow-up, 45% reported post-concussion symptom, 48% exhibited disability and 55% were satisfied with life as a whole. In comparison with the sick-leave situation on admission to hospital, 3 patients were on sick-leave at the time of follow-up because of the head trauma. Stepwise forward logistic regression analysis revealed a statistically significant association (p<0.05) between disability and S-100B and dizziness. Conclusion: In spite of frequent persistent symptoms, disabilities and low levels of life satisfaction, the sick-leave frequency was low at follow-up. The association between S-100B and disability supports the notion that long-term consequences of a mild brain injury may partly be a result of brain tissue injury.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据