4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Chronic villitis in untreated neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: An etiology for severe early intrauterine growth restriction and the effect of intravenous immunoglobulin therapy

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
卷 193, 期 3, 页码 1100-1104

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.06.043

关键词

neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia; chronic villitis; intrauterine growth restriction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The objective of the study was to examine placental histopathology in intravenous immunoglobulin-treated and untreated neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia, and correlate pathological findings with clinical outcomes. Study design: Placentas from 14 neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia-affected pregnancies were identified. Maternal antepartum treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin and pregnancy outcomes were abstracted from medical records. Placental histopathology and clinical outcomes were compared between intravenous immunoglobulin and no intravenous immunoglobulin treatment groups using Fisher's exact test. One subject, treated only after an intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) was diagnosed, was excluded from the analysis. P < .05 was considered significant. Results: Untreated pregnancies demonstrated a lymphoplasmacytic chronic villitis not seen in the intravenous immunoglobulin-treated pregnancies (P = .005). Intrauterine growth restriction and intrauterine fetal demise occurred as frequently as ICH in the untreated group. No ICH, intrauterine growth restriction, or intrauterine fetal demises occurred in the treated group, although the P value was not significant. Conclusion: Chronic villitis is frequently manifest in neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia, with intravenous immunoglobulin alleviating this inflammatory immunologic response. We suspect a more universal role for the maternal antibody, such as fetal endothelial cell damage, in the sequelae of neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia. (C) 2005 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据