4.5 Article

Molecular oxygen reduction in PEM fuel cell conditions:: ToF-SIMS analysis of Co-based electrocatalysts

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 109, 期 35, 页码 16718-16724

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp0529265

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of Co-based electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction in acid media has been prepared using two different Co precursors: cobalt acetate (CoAc) and a cobalt porphyrin (CoTMPP). These catalysts have been analyzed by ToF-SINIS to obtain information on the number and the structure of catalytic active sites in these materials. The results are compared with the results of a similar analysis already performed on a series of Fe-based electrocatalysts (J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 8705) also prepared with two different Fe precursors: iron acetate (FeAc) and an iron porphyrin (ClFeTMPP). The interpretation of ToF-SIMS data for Fe-based catalysts allowed us to conclude that whatever the Fe precursor was, the same catalytic sites (FeN2/C and FeN4/C, with their respective dominant ToF-SIMS signatures: FeN2C4+ and FeN4C8+ ions) were found. The comparison of the ToF-SIMS data with the activity of those catalysts led to the conclusion that the FeN2/C catalytic site was more active than FeN4/C. When the same procedure is applied to ToF-SIMS data measured for Co-based catalysts, the following conclusions are drawn: (i) as for Fe precursors, both Co precursors also give similar results; (ii) as for Fe-based catalysts, the same four families of MetalN(x)C(y)(+) ions, with 1, 2, 3, and 4 nitrogen atoms, are also found in the spectra of Co-based catalysts, but there is no dominant CoNxCy+ ion signature; (iii) only CoN4/C can be ascertained on the basis of ToF-SIMS measurements. There is no strong support from ToF-SIMS measurements for (or against) the existence of CoN2/C in Co-based catalysts as there is for FeN2/C in Fe-based catalysts; (iv) contrary to Fe-based catalysts, all catalytic sites (if there are any besides CoN4/C are about equally active in Co-based electrocatalysts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据