4.6 Article

BMP-2 and insulin-like growth factor-I mediate osterix (Osx) expression in human mesenchymal stem cells via the MAPK and protein kinase D signaling pathways

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 280, 期 36, 页码 31353-31359

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M503845200

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genetic studies place the transcription factor Osterix (Osx) downstream of Runx2, but limited information is available about Osx regulation during osteoblastic differentiation. An important role for bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) on Osx expression and the requirement for p38 for the BMP-2-mediated effect was reported previously by our group. In this study, we continued to investigate the molecular mechanisms by which BMP-2 and IGF-1 regulate Osx expression during osteoblast lineage progression. IGF-I-mediated Osx expression required all three MAPK components (Erk, p38, and JNK), whereas BMP-2 required p38 and JNK signaling. As a common mediator of growth factor signaling, we also investigated the involvement of protein kinase C/D (PKC/D) signaling. BMP-2- and IGF-I-mediated Osx expression was blocked in response to a PKD inhibitor. A selective inhibitor of conventional PKCs had no effect on the BMP-2-mediated Osx expression. BMP-2 and IGF-I induced a selective phosphorylation of PKD, and PKD was required for mineralization. PKC/D and MAPK signaling also mediate Runx2 activity. Therefore, to document the implication for Runx2 in Osx regulation, we blocked Runx2 activity using a dominant negative Runx2 construct and an ubiquitination mediator for Runx2 degradation. We showed that blocking Runx2 activity inhibited the BMP-2-mediated induction of Osx. These studies implicated that multiple signaling pathways mediate Osx, a critical gene for osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. In addition to Runx2, other signaling components may be necessary to regulate Osx during osteoblast lineage progression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据