4.7 Article

Carbon and nitrogen pools in Chinese fir and evergreen broadleaved forests and changes associated with felling and burning in mid-subtropical China

期刊

FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
卷 216, 期 1-3, 页码 216-226

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.05.030

关键词

Chinese fir (CL); evergreen broadleaved forest (BF); soil carbon; soil nitrogen; clear-cutting; slash burning

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A Chinese fir forest (Cunninghamia lanceolata, CL) and a secondary evergreen broadleaved forest (BF) located in Fujian Province, south-eastern China, were examined before clear-cutting to compare their ecosystem carbon and nitrogen pools (above- and below-ground tree, understorey vegetation and forest floor biomass + 0-100 cm mineral soil layer). The ecosystem pools of C and N in the CL before clear-cutting were 257 Mg ha(-1) and 8605 kg ha(-1), respectively. The corresponding values for the BF were 336 Mg ha(-1) of C and 10,248 kg ha(-1) of N. For the two forests, most of the C was in the trees, whereas most of the N pool was in the soil. C and N pools in understorey vegetation and forest floor were small in the two forests (about 2% of ecosystem pools). During clear-cutting, 117 Mg ha(-1) C and 307 kg ha(-1) N in stem wood with bark and coarse branches (> 2 cm) were removed from the CL compared to 159 Mg ha(-1) C and 741 kg ha(-1) N from the BF. Two days after slash burning, C removal from logging residues (including forest floor material) was estimated at 10 Mg ha-1 for CL and 23 Mg ha(-1) for BF, and N removal was 233 and 490 kg ha(-1) in the CL and BF, respectively. Compared with the pre-burn levels in the CL, contents of topsoil organic C and total N 2 days after burning were reduced by 17 and 19%, respectively. In the BF, the corresponding proportions were 27% (C) and 25% (N). Our results indicate that clear-cutting and slash burning had caused marked short-term changes in ecosystem C and N in the two forests. How long these changes will persist needs further study. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据