4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Influence of hepatitis C virus infection on HIV-1 disease progression and response to highly active antiretroviral therapy

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 192, 期 6, 页码 992-1002

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1086/432762

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. To assess hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody prevalence in the EuroSIDA cohort, along with survival, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 disease progression, virologic response (plasma HIV-1 RNA load of < 500 copies/mL), and CD4 cell count recovery by HCV serostatus in patients initiating highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Results. HCV serostatus at or before enrollment was available for 5957 patients; 1960 (33%) and 3997 (67%) were HCV seropositive and seronegative, respectively. No association between an increased incidence of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-defining illnesses or death and HCV serostatus was seen after adjustment for other prognostic risk factors known at baseline (adjusted incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.97 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.81-1.16]). However, there was a large increase in the incidence of liver disease-related deaths in HCV-seropositive patients in adjusted models (IRR, 11.71 [95% CI, 6.42 - 21.34]). Among 2260 patients of known HCV serostatus initiating HAART, after adjustment, there was no significant difference between HCV-seropositive and - seronegative patients with respect to virologic response ( relative hazard [ RH], 1.13 [ 95% CI, 0.84 - 1.51]) and immunologic response, whether measured as a >= 50% increase (RH, 0.94 [ 95% CI, 0.77 - 1.16]) or a >= 50 cells/mL increase (RH, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.77-1.11]) in CD4 cell count after HAART initiation. Conclusions. HCV serostatus did not affect the risk of HIV-1 disease progression, but the risk of liver diseaserelated deaths was markedly increased in HCV-seropositive patients. The overall virologic and immunologic responses to HAART were not affected by HCV serostatus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据