4.5 Article

C-terminal EH-domain-containing proteins: consensus for a role in endocytic trafficking, EH?

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
卷 118, 期 18, 页码 4093-4101

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.02595

关键词

Eps15 homology (EH) domain; endocytosis; recycling

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [P20 RR018759] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Eps15-homology (EH) domain is a highly conserved motif comprising similar to 100 residues that is found in proteins from species as diverse as yeast and mammals. Proteins that have an EH domain can carry out a variety of crucial cellular functions ranging from regulation of the actin cytoskeleton, signal transduction and transcriptional regulation to control of the endocytic pathway. EH domains bind to proteins that contain the tripeptide asparagine-proline-phenylalanine (NPF). Although EH domains are typically found at the N-terminus, mammalian cells express four highly homologous C-terminal EH-domain-containing paralogs (EHD1-EHD4), which exhibit broad amino acid conservation throughout the entire sequence. These C-terminal EH-domain-containing proteins also contain a central coiled-coil region involved in oligomerization, as well as an N-terminal nucleotide-binding motif. Recent studies have identified an array of novel binding partners for EHD1-EHD4, including NPF-containing proteins, such as the divalent Rab4/5 effector rabenosyn 5, the cell fate determinant Numb, EH-binding protein 1 (EHBP1) and syndapins I and II. Interactions with the clathrin heavy-chain and components of the internalization machinery have also been described. Indeed, C-terminal EH-domain-containing proteins appear to regulate several key endocytic steps, including internalization and recycling. EHD1 and EHD4 control recycling by regulating the transport of receptors from the recycling compartment to the plasma membrane. EHD1, EHD2 and EHD4 have also been implicated in the internalization of receptors and their transport to early endosomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据