4.5 Article

Osteoclastic resorption of calcium phosphate coatings applied with electrostatic spray deposition (ESD), in vitro

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.30332

关键词

osteoclast; electrostatic spray deposition; calcium phosphate; resorption lacunae

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Calcium phosphate (CaP) coatings have been applied on titanium implants to improve the bioactivity in order to favor the initial bone healing response. Recently, a new technique has been developed to apply Cap coatings: electrostatic spray deposition (ESD). Although ESD-derived coatings have several benefits, it is not known whether they are degradable. This study was designed to examine the cell-mediated degradation of two ESD-derived coatings with different chemical compositions, that is, beta-tricalcium phosphate (beta-TCP) and carbonate apatite (CA). First, coatings were deposited and analyzed physiochemically. Subsequently, rat bone marrow-derived osteoclastlike cells were seeded on the coatings, and analyzed with osteoclast-specific markers, scanning electron microscopy, and transmission electron microscopy. Results showed that both coatings exhibited porous morphologies, with an average pore size of less than 1 mu m (beta-TCP), or larger than 1 mu m (CA). After heat treatment, both coatings were crystalline in structure. The Ca/P ratios were 1.4 to 1.5 for the beta-TCP coating, and 1.8 to 2.0 for the CA coating. After 8 and 12 days of culture, multinucleated osteoclastlike cells were observed on both coatings. The osteoclast phenotype was confirmed by tartrate resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining, and immunostaining against the calcitonin receptor. Using scanning electron microscopy, numerous resorption lacunae were observed in both coatings. Finally, transmission electron microscopy of TRAP-positive cells confirmed the osteoclastlike aspect of the cells revealing multiple nuclei and a ruffled border. In conclusion, CaP coatings produced with the ESD process can be degraded by osteoclasts. (c) 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据