4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Randomized phase IIB trial of BLP25 liposome vaccine in stage IIIB and IV non-small-cell lung cancer

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 23, 期 27, 页码 6674-6681

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.13.011

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose To evaluate the effect of BLP25 liposome vaccine (L-BLP25) on survival and toxicity in patients with stage 111B and IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Secondary objectives included health-related quality of life (QOL) and immune responses elicited by L-BLP25. Patients and Methods Patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2 and stable or responding stage 111B or IV NSCLC after any first-line chemotherapy were prestratified by stage and randomly assigned to either L-BLP25 plus best supportive care (BSC) or BSC alone. Patients in the L-BLP25 arm received a single intravenous dose of cyclophosphamide 300 Mg/m(2) followed by eight weekly subcutaneous immunizations with L-BLP25 (1,000 mu g). Subsequent immunizations were administered at 6-week intervals. Results The survival results indicate a median survival time of 4.4 months longer for patients randomly assigned to the L-BLP25 arm (88 patients) compared with patients assigned to the BSC arm (83 patients; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.739; 95% Cl, 0.509 to 1.073; P = .112). The greatest effect was observed in stage 111B locoregional (LR) patients, for whom the median survival time for the L-BLP25 arm has not yet been reached compared with 13.3 months for the BSC arm (adjusted HR = 0.524; 95% Cl, 0.261 to 1.052; P = .069). No significant toxicity was observed. QOL was maintained longer in patients on the L-BLP25 arm. Conclusion L-BLP25 maintenance therapy in patients with advanced NSCLC is feasible with minimal toxicity. The survival difference of 4.4 months observed with the vaccine did not reach statistical significance. In the subgroup of patients with stage 111B LR disease, a strong trend in 2-year survival in favor of L-BLP25 was observed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据