4.7 Article

Use of a case definition approach to identify cancer-related fatigue in women undergoing adjuvant therapy for breast cancer

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 23, 期 27, 页码 6613-6622

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.07.024

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose Use a proposed case-definition approach to identify the prevalence of cancer-related fatigue (CRF), demographic, clinical and psychosocial predictors of subsequent CRF, and psychosocial factors associated with concurrent CRF. Patients and Methods Women (n = 288) undergoing adjuvant therapy for early-stage breast cancer were recruited from two outpatient clinics, Women completed a baseline assessment before adjuvant therapy and a post-treatment assessment at the conclusion of an initial course of adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy. At both assessments, women completed a clinical interview and measures of fatigue, distress, coping, and quality of life (QOL). The clinical interview consisted of modules from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) and a diagnostic interview to identify cases of CRF. Results CRF prevalence at the baseline and post-treatment assessments was 10% and 26%, respectively. Multivariate analyses identified factors prospectively associated with greater including receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy risk for CRF at the post-treatment assessment, and a tendency to catastrophize in response to fatigue. Patients with and without CRF differed on a host of concurrent measures of fatigue, depression, functioning, and QOL with mean effect sizes in the range of 1.0 standard deviation. Conclusion CRF is a clinical syndrome experienced before and during adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. Results suggest CRF has a multifactorial etiology and support use of the proposed case definition approach to defining CRF. Future research is necessary to determine the scientific value of these criteria for understanding the etiology and management of fatigue in the oncology setting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据