4.7 Article

Withdrawal from chronic nicotine administration impairs contextual fear conditioning in C57BL/6 mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 25, 期 38, 页码 8708-8713

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2853-05.2005

关键词

nicotine withdrawal; acetylcholine; hippocampus; addiction; learning; tolerance

资金

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [R01 DA017949, R01 DA017949-01A2, T32 DA007237, T32DA07237, DA017949] Funding Source: Medline
  2. PHS HHS [P5084718] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of acute nicotine administration (0.09 mg/ kg nicotine), chronic nicotine administration ( 6.3 mg/kg/d nicotine for 14 d), and withdrawal from chronic nicotine administration on fear conditioning in C57BL/6 mice were examined. Mice were trained using two coterminating conditioned stimulus (30s; 85 dB white noise)-unconditioned stimulus (2s; 0.57 mA foot shock) pairings and tested 24 h later for contextual and cued fear conditioning. Acute nicotine administration enhanced contextual fear conditioning, chronic nicotine administration had no effect on contextual fear conditioning, and withdrawal from chronic nicotine administration impaired contextual fear conditioning. Plasma nicotine concentrations were similar after acute and chronic treatment and were within the range reported for smokers. During withdrawal, concentrations of nicotine were undetectable. An acute dose of nicotine ( 0.09 mg/ kg) during withdrawal from chronic nicotine treatment reversed withdrawal-associated deficits in contextual fear conditioning. The results suggest that tolerance to the effects of nicotine on contextual fear conditioning develops with chronic nicotine treatment at a physiologically relevant dose, and withdrawal from this chronic nicotine treatment is associated with impairments in contextual fear conditioning. These findings provide a model of how the effects of nicotine on learning may contribute to the development and maintenance of nicotine addiction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据