4.8 Article

Autoantibody signatures in prostate cancer

期刊

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
卷 353, 期 12, 页码 1224-1235

出版社

MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa051931

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P50 CA69568, R01 CA8241901-A1, UO1CA111275, 5P30CA46592] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01GM72007-01, R01 GM072007-03, R01 GM072007] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: New biomarkers, such as autoantibody signatures, may improve the early detection of prostate cancer. METHODS: With a phage-display library derived from prostate-cancer tissue, we developed and used phage protein microarrays to analyze serum samples from 119 patients with prostate cancer and 138 controls, with the samples equally divided into training and validation sets. A phage-peptide detector that was constructed from the training set was evaluated on an independent validation set of 128 serum samples (60 from patients with prostate cancer and 68 from controls). RESULTS: A 22-phage-peptide detector had 88.2 percent specificity (95 percent confidence interval, 0.78 to 0.95) and 81.6 percent sensitivity (95 percent confidence interval, 0.70 to 0.90) in discriminating between the group with prostate cancer and the control group. This panel of peptides performed better than did prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in distinguishing between the group with prostate cancer and the control group (area under the curve for the autoantibody signature, 0.93; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.88 to 0.97; area under the curve for PSA, 0.80; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.71 to 0.88). Logistic-regression analysis revealed that the phage-peptide panel provided additional discriminative power over PSA (P<0.001). Among the 22 phage peptides used as a detector, 4 were derived from in-frame, named coding sequences. The remaining phage peptides were generated from untranslated sequences. CONCLUSIONS: Autoantibodies against peptides derived from prostate-cancer tissue could be used as the basis for a screening test for prostate cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据