4.7 Article

Effects of inhalation anesthetics halothane, sevoflurane, and isoflurane on human cell lines

期刊

LIFE SCIENCES
卷 77, 期 19, 页码 2369-2383

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2004.12.052

关键词

inhaled anesthetics; halothane; isoflurane; sevoflurane; human tumor cells; DNA synthesis; RNA synthesis; protein synthesis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

(C)ytotoxic and antiproliferative effects of halothane, isoflurane, and sevoflurane in anesthetic doses on human colon carcinoma (Caco-2), larynx carcinoma (HEp-2), pancreatic carcinoma cells (MIA PaCa-2), poorly differentiated cells from lymph node metastasis of colon carcinoma (SW-620), and normal fibroblasts were investigated. Cells were exposed to anesthetic gas mixture consisting of O-2: N2O (35:60 vol.%), halothane (1.5 vol.%) or isoflurane (2.0 vol.%) or sevoflurane (3.0 vol.%), and CO2 (5 vol.%), for 2, 4, and 6 h. Cytotoxicity of anesthetics was analyzed by validated tetrazolium dye assay MTT test. All anesthetics expressed cytotoxic effects on treated tumor cells in time and cell line dependent manner. Growth suppression in cells exposed to halothane was enhanced in HEp-2 (to 67.7%), Caco-2 (to 76.3%), and SW620 cells (to 80.9%), and was minimal in normal fibroblasts (to 89.4%). Antiproliferative activity of halothane was measured via radioactive precursors incorporation assay. In Caco-2 cells treated by halothane, decrease in DNA synthesis (52.4%, p=0.001), RNA synthesis (39.2%, p<0.001), and protein synthesis (19.2%, p=0.004) was observed. In HEp-2 cells, DNA and RNA syntheses were decreased to 72.5% and 79.9%, whereas protein synthesis was 14.0% of control (p < 0.001). In SW620 cells, protein synthesis after 4 h was 24.4% (p = 0.007). A DNA fragmentation was observed in Caco-2 and MIA PaCa-2 cells. Exposition of phosphatidylserine on outer lipid bilayer plasma membrane of tumor cell treated by halothane proved apoptosis as mode of cell death. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据