4.5 Article

Quantitation of astragaloside IV in rat plasma by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2005.07.032

关键词

Astragalus membranaceous; astragaloside IV

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A simple, sensitive and specific liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method (LC-MS-MS) had been developed and validated for the quantitation of astragaloside IV (AGS-IV)-an active constituent of Radix Astragali in rat plasma. Assay method was developed by a series of operations described as below. The plasma proteins were precipitated with acetonitrile and digoxin was used as the internal standard (I.S.). The sample solution containing astragaloside IV and the I.S. were obtained and subsequently injected into a LC-MS-MS system following by a gradient elution at a slow flow rate combined with a valve diversion during the liquid chromatography. Chromatographic separation was achieved on a C4 (2.1 rum x 10 mm) column with a gradient mobile phase comprised of 90% methanol in water and 10 mM ammonium acetate buffer. The analytes were detected with a PE Sciex API 3000 mass spectrometer using turbo ion spray with positive ionization. Ions monitored in the multiple reaction-monitoring (MRM) modes were m/z 785.5 (precursor ion) to m/Z 143.2 (product ion) for AGS-IV and m/z 781.2 (precursor ion) to m/z 243.3 (product ion) for digoxin (I.S.). The method was validated over a linear range of 1-1000ng/ml. The low limit of quantitation was 1.0ng/ml. Results from a 3-day validation study demonstrated that the developed method possessed good precision (CV% values were between 5.9 and 7.6%) and accuracy (96.5-102.1%) across the calibration range. The recoveries were 91 and 90% for astragaloside IV and I.S., and no significant matrix effects were observed. QC samples were stable when kept at room temperature for 4 h, at -20 degrees C for 4 weeks, and after three freeze/thaw cycles. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据