4.4 Article

Secondary quinone in photosystem II of Thermosynechococcus elongatus:: Semiquinone-iron EPR signals and temperature dependence of electron transfer

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 44, 期 38, 页码 12780-12789

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi051000k

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The secondary quinone acceptor, Q(B), has been studied in photosystem II (PSII) isolated from Thermosynechococcus (T) elongatus. Thermoluminescence indicated that Q(B) was present in this preparation. An EPR signal observed at low temperature at g = 1.9 was attributed to Fe(2+)Q(B)(-) on the basis of the characteristic period-of-two variations in its intensity depending on the number of laser flashes given at 20 degrees C. When samples showing the Fe(2+)Q(B)(-) signal were illuminated at 77 K, an EPR signal at g = 1.66 appeared with an amplitude proportional to that of the Fe(2+)Q(B)(-) signal. This signal is attributed to the Q(A)(-)Fe(2+)Q(B)(-) state. While these attributions have been made previously in PSII from other origins, they have remained relatively tentative since the characteristic period-of-two oscillations Of Q(B) had not previously been observed. The flash experiments indicated that more than one exchangeable plastoquinone is associated with the isolated PSII. The g = 1.66 signal from the QA-Fe(2+)Q(B)(-) state was used to study the temperature dependence of electron transfer between the two quinones. Electron transfer occurred in half of the centers (after 30 s incubation) at -28 degrees C for Q(A)(-) to Q(B) but at -58 degrees C for Q(A)(-) to Q(B)(-) This marked difference for the two electron transfer reactions indicates different types of rate-limiting reactions. In the better studied but homologous system, the purple bacterial reaction center, the Q(A)(-) to Q(B) step is limited by a gating process, while the Q(A)(-) to Q(B)(-) step is limited by protonation events. Similar reactions in PSII could give rise to the observed temperature dependence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据