4.7 Article

Protective effects of black tea extract on testosterone induced oxidative damage in prostate

期刊

CANCER LETTERS
卷 227, 期 2, 页码 125-132

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2004.10.046

关键词

reactive oxidative species; oxidative stress; testosterone; antioxidant enzyme; black tea

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Since ancient times, antipyretic, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial and antioxidative properties of tea have been recognized. Black tea (Camellia sinensis) contains a variety of polyphenolic ingredients including the theaflavins (TF), thearubigins (TG) and catechins. Components from black tea have been accounted to play an important role in scavenging free radicals generated by mutagens and carcinogens. Androgens are the key factors in either the initiation or progression of prostate cancer (PCA) by inducing oxidative stress. In the present set of investigations, the antioxidative potential of black tea extract against androgen mediated oxidative stress in male Wistar rats has been studied. Testosterone was given at a dose of 5 mg/kg b.w. subcutaneously, consecutively for 5 days. Prior to androgen administration, animals were kept on 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5% aqueous tea extract (ATE) as sole source of drinking fluid for 15 days. The prostate tissue was dissected out for biochemical analysis for antioxidant enzymes viz. catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), lipid peroxidation (LPO), glutathione-s-transferase (GST) and glutathione reductase (GR). The results revealed that testosterone administration induced the oxidative stress in rat prostate, however, in 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5% ATE supplemented groups, a significant protective effect of black tea against testosterone induced oxidative injury was recorded. Hence, the study reveals that constituents present in black tea impart protection against androgen induced oxidative injury that may result in development of prostate cancer. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据