4.6 Article

Bcl-xL mediates increased production of humanized monoclonal antibodies in chinese hamster ovary cells

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING
卷 91, 期 7, 页码 779-792

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bit.20551

关键词

apoptosis; Bcl-x(L); CHO; humanized antibody; serum free medium; sodium butyrate

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Enhanced product yields, reduction in through put time, improved cost-effectiveness and product quality are examples of benefits gained by delaying apoptotic cell death in bioreactors. To examine the effect on recombinant protein production, bcl-x(L) was overexpressed in a CHO cell line secreting humanized monoclonal antibody directed against the alpha 1 beta 1 integrin. When cell lines overexpressing bcl-x(L) were compared to the parent, cell viability was increased by 20% and titers by 80%. Total viable cell densities were similar and specific productivities were enhanced by almost two-fold on scale-up to bioreactors. Comparison in a chemically defined media demonstrated an even greater sustained viability in bcl-x(L) expressing cells by 50% and up to 90% increase in titer with no impact on product quality. Caspase 3 activities were monitored as a marker for apoptotic cell death. In the presence of Bcl-x(L), caspase activities were reduced to background levels. The role of Bcl-x(L) in protecting cells from premature death was further examined in studies performed in the presence of NaBu, at concentrations known to trigger cell death. Results demonstrated that cells expressing bcl-x(L) retained 88% cell viability with > 2 fold increase in titer. Bcl-x(L) was similarly overexpressed in a different CHO cell line producing a humanized mAb against the chemokine MCP1. Once again, production titer was increased by 80% and viability by 75%. Together the studies have shown that overexpression of bcl-x(L) in production cell lines was able to significantly increase the titer by enhancing both the specific activity and total cell viability while maintaining product quality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据