4.5 Article

Dimensional phenotypic analysis and functional categorisation of mutations reveal novel genotype-phenotype associations in Rett syndrome

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
卷 13, 期 10, 页码 1121-1130

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201471

关键词

Rett syndrome; MECP2; mutation; phenotype; association

资金

  1. Economic and Social Research Council [RES-145-28-1003] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We aimed to improve the understanding of genotype-phenotype correlations in Rett syndrome (RS) by adopting a novel approach to categorising phenotypic dimensions - separating typicality of presentation, outcome severity and age of onset - and by classifying MECP2 mutations strictly by predicted functional attributes. MECP2 mutation screening results were available on 190 patients with a clinical diagnosis of RS (140 cases with classic RS, 50 with atypical RS). 135 cases had identified mutations. Of the 140 patients, 116 with classic RS (82.9%) had an identified mutation compared with 19 of 50 patients (38%) with an atypical presentation. Cases with early onset of regression and seizures, and those with clinical features that might indicate alternative aetiologies, were less likely to have mutations. Individuals with late truncating mutations had a less typical presentation than cases with missense and early truncating mutations, presumably reflecting greater residual function of MECP2 protein. Individuals with early truncating mutations had a more severe outcome than cases with missense and late truncating mutations. These findings held when restricting the analysis to cases over 15 years of age and classic cases only. Previous findings of variation in severity among the common mutations were confirmed. The approach to phenotypic and genotypic classification adopted here allowed us to identify genotype-phenotype associations in RS that may aid our understanding of pathogenesis and also contribute to clinical knowledge on the impact of different types of mutations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据