4.4 Article

In vitro response of MC3T3-E1 preosteoblasts within three-dimensional apatite-coated PLGA scaffolds

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30261

关键词

hydroxylapatite; tissue engineering; scaffold; osteogenesis; biomimetic

资金

  1. NIDCR NIH HHS [1R03DE13956-01] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biomimetic apatites have been reported to promote osteogenic activities in numerous in vivo and in vitro models, but the precise mechanism by which the apatite micro-environment promotes such activities is not well understood. Such mechanistic studies require reproducible model systems that are relevant to tissue engineering practices. Although two-dimensional (2D) apatite-coated polystyrene culture dishes provide practicality and reproducibility, they do not simulate the effects of the three-dimensional (D) microenvironment and degrading polymeric substrates. A simple 3D model system to address these relevant effects, and its utilization in the investigation of apatite-promoted osteoblastic differentiation in vitro is reported in this paper. Apatite coating was achieved by sequentially immersing poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) scaffolds into different simulated body fluids (SBF). SEM, EDX, FTIR, TEM electron diffraction confirmed the apatite coating to comprise of calcium-deficient carbonated hydroxyapatite crystals. While both apatite-coated and noncoated PLGA scaffolds supported MC3T3-E1 attachment, spreading, and proliferation, significant differences in osteoblastic differentiation were observed. Relative to noncoated controls, quantitative real-time PCR revealed significant apatite-associated suppression of alkaline phosphatase (ALP), early upregulation of osteopontin (OPN) at 3 days, and upregulation of osteocalcin (OCN) and bone sialoprotein (BSP) at 4 weeks. In summary, apatite-promoted osteoblastic differentiation can be observed in a 3D model system that is relevant to tissue engineering. (c) 2005 Wiley Periodicals. Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据