4.5 Article

Predicting sediment metal toxicity using a sediment biotic ligand model: Methodology and initial application

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY
卷 24, 期 10, 页码 2410-2427

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1897/04-413R.1

关键词

metal; toxicity; sediment; organic carbon

资金

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [P42ES10344] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An extension of the simultaneously extracted metals/acid-volatile sulfide (SEM/AVS) procedure is presented that predicts the acute and chronic sediment metals effects concentrations. A biotic ligand model (BLM) and a pore water-sediment partitioning model are used to predict the sediment concentration that is in equilibrium with the biotic ligand effects concentration. This initial application considers only partitioning to sediment particulate organic carbon. This procedure bypasses the need to compute the details of the pore-water chemistry. Remarkably, the median lethal concentration on a sediment organic carbon (OC)-normalized basis, SEMxOC*, is essentially unchanged over a wide range of concentrations of pore-water hardness, salinity, dissolved organic carbon, and any other complexing or competing ligands. Only the pore-water pH is important. Both acute and chronic exposures in fresh- and saltwater sediments are compared to predictions for cadmium (Cd), copper (Cu), nickel (Ni), lead (Pb), and zinc (Zn) based on the Daphnia magna BLM. The SEMxOC* concentrations are similar for all the metals except cadmium. For pH = 8, the approximate values (mu mol/-OC) are Cd-SEMxOC* similar or equal to 100, Cu-SEMxOC* similar or equal to 900, Ni-SEMxOC* similar or equal to 1,100, Zn-SEMxOC* similar or equal to 1,400, and Pb-SEMxOC* similar or equal to 2,700. This similarity is the explanation for an empirically observed dose-response relationship between SEM and acute and chronic effects concentrations that had been observed previously. This initial application clearly demonstrates that BLMs can be used to predict toxic sediment concentrations without modeling the pore-water chemistry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据