4.6 Article

Genome scan of systemic biomarkers of vascular inflammation in the Framingham Heart Study: Evidence for susceptibility loci on 1q

期刊

ATHEROSCLEROSIS
卷 182, 期 2, 页码 307-314

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2005.02.015

关键词

inflammation; genetics; epidemiology; risk factors; cardiovascular diseases

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [N01-HV-28178, HL64753, HL60886, HL04334, N01-HC-25195, HL70139, HL76784-01] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK55656] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vascular inflammation plays a central role in atherosclerosis and inflammatory biomarkers predict risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Thus, finding genes that influence systemic levels of inflammatory biomarkers may provide insights into genetic determinants of vascular inflammation and CVD. We conducted variance-component linkage analyses of blood levels of four biomarkers of vascular inflammation [C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1)] in 304 extended families from the Framingham Heart Study, using data from a 10 cM genome scan. We computed p-values by a permutation approach. Heritability estimates ranged from 14% (IL-6) to 44% (MCP-1) after log transforming and adjusting for covariates. Significant linkage to MCP-1 was found on chromosome 1 (LOD = 4.27 at 186 cM; genome-wide p = 0.005), in a region containing inflammatory candidate genes such as SELE, SELP (E- and P-selectin) and CRP. Other linkage peaks with LOD scores >2 were found for MCP-1 on chromosome 1 (LOD = 2.04 at 16 cM; LOD = 2.34 at 70 cM) and chromosome 17 (LOD = 2.44 at 22 cM) and for sICAM-1 on chromosome 1 at 229 cM (LOD = 2.09) less than 5 cM from the interleukin-10 (IL10) gene. Multiple genes on chromosome 1 may influence inflammatory biomarker levels and may have a potential role in development of CVD. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据