4.1 Article

Evaluation of four tenofovir-containing regimens as first-line treatments in Cameroon and Senegal: the ANRS 12115 DAYANA Trial

期刊

ANTIVIRAL THERAPY
卷 19, 期 1, 页码 51-59

出版社

INT MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.3851/IMP2675

关键词

-

资金

  1. ANRS
  2. Gilead Sciences
  3. Merck Sharp Dohme
  4. Abbott Laboratories

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The aim of the present study was to determine appropriate tenofovir-based regimens meriting evaluation in large-scale randomized trials among sub-Saharan African patients. Methods: This was a randomized open-label 96-week prospective pilot study evaluating four first-line regimens: tenofovir/emtricitabine/nevirapine (group 1),tenofovir/lopinavir/ritonavir(group 2), tenofovir/emtricitabine/zidovudine (group 3) and tenofovir/emtricitabine/ efavirenz (group 4) in antiretroviral-naive, HIV-1-infected patients in Senegal and Cameroon. The primary end point was defined as an HIV-1 RNA viral load < 50 copies/ml (study detection limit) at week 16 in >= 50% of patients using intention-to-treat analysis. Results: At baseline, 119 patients included were 34% male, had a median plasma viral load of 5.4 log 10 copies/ml and median CD4(+) T-cell count of 200 cells/mm(3) range 53-358). The primary end point was achieved for groups 1, 3 and 4 (58% [n=31], 62% [n=29] and 53% [n=30], respectively), but not for group 2 (38% [n=29]). At week 96, undetectable HIV-1 RNA had been achieved in 74% of patients in group 1, 38% in group 2, 72% in group 3 and 73% in group 4. Patients with detectable HIV-1 RNA at week 16 were more likely to have baseline HIV-1 RNA >= 100,000 copies/ml (adjusted OR 5.56, 95% CI 1.72, 16.67). HIV mutations associated with protease inhibitor resistance emerged in three patients, all of whom were in group 2. Anaemia occurred in two group 3 patients and was the only serious treatment-related adverse event. Conclusions: Three efficient and safe tenofovir-based triple regimens were identified; the two-drug regimen (tenofovir/lopinavir/ritonavir) did not achieve the protocol-defined virological threshold of efficacy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据