3.9 Article

Microtubules in Candida albicans hyphae drive nuclear dynamics and connect cell cycle progression to morphogenesis

期刊

EUKARYOTIC CELL
卷 4, 期 10, 页码 1697-1711

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/EC.4.10.1697-1711.2005

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI 14666] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDCR NIH HHS [DE 14666, R01 DE014666] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [T32 GM008347, GM08347] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Candida albicans is an opportunistic fungal pathogen whose virulence is related to its ability to switch between yeast, pseudohyphal, and true-hyphal morphologies. To ask how long-distance nuclear migration occurs in C albicans hyphae, we identified the fundamental properties of nuclear movements and microtubule dynamics using time-lapse microscopy. In hyphae, nuclei migrate to, and divide across, the presumptive site of septation, which forms 10 to 15 mu m distal to the basal cell. The mother nucleus returns to the basal cell, while the daughter nucleus reiterates the process. We used time-lapse microscopy to identify the mechanisms by which C. albicans nuclei move over long distances and are coordinated with hyphal morphology. We followed nuclear migration and spindle dynamics, as well as the time and position of septum specification, defined it as the presumptum, and established a chronology of nuclear, spindle, and morphological events. Analysis of microtubule dynamics revealed that premitotic forward nuclear migration is due to the repetitive sliding of astral microtubulles along the cell cortex but that postmitotic forward and reverse nuclear migrations are due primarily to spindle elongation. Free microtubules exhibit cell cycle regulation; they are present during interphase and disappear at the time of spindle assembly. Finally, a growth defect in strains expressing Tub2-green fluorescent protein revealed a connection between hyphal elongation and the nuclear cell cycle that is coordinated by hyphal length and/or volume.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据