4.1 Article

Effect of oseltamivir, zanamivir or oseltamivir-zanamivir combination treatments on transmission of influenza in households

期刊

ANTIVIRAL THERAPY
卷 17, 期 6, 页码 1085-1090

出版社

INT MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.3851/IMP2128

关键词

-

资金

  1. Roche
  2. Preclinical Pharmacokinetic Department

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The effectiveness of neuraminidase inhibitors to reduce transmission when used as treatment in influenza-infected patients remains debated. Methods: In a prespecified analysis of a blinded randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of oseltamivir-zanamivir combination therapy versus oseltamivir and zanamivir monotherapy conducted during the 2008-2009 seasonal influenza epidemic, we compared the rate of secondary illness in household contacts of influenza-positive index patients between arms. Secondary illness was defined as occurrence in contacts of fever plus cough within 7 days from randomization of index patients. Analyses were conducted according to the delay between patients' onset of symptoms and intervention. Results: A total of 543 household contacts of 267 index patients were included, of which 466 had follow-up assessment. A secondary illness was reported in 58 (12.5%) contacts with no significant difference between arms overall (P= 0.07). When the analysis was limited to the 232 contacts of 136 index patients with first treatment intake within 24 h of onset of symptoms, a lower rate of secondary illness was reported in the combination therapy arm (2 of 56 [4%]) than in the oseltamivir arm (14 of 81 [17%]; P= 0.014) and the zanamivir arm (14 of 95 [15%]; P= 0.031). Multivariate analysis accounting for intra-household correlation confirmed these findings. Conclusions: Our analysis suggests a greater effectiveness of the combination therapy to reduce transmissibility when given to the index patient within 24 h of onset of symptoms. As the finding was obtained from a subgroup analysis, it should be interpreted with caution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据