4.5 Article

A mouse sperm decapacitation factor receptor is phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein 1

期刊

REPRODUCTION
卷 130, 期 4, 页码 497-508

出版社

BIO SCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1530/rep.1.00792

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Capacitation is a pivotal event for mammalian spermatozoa, involving the loss of surface proteins known as decapacitation factors (DF) and consequent acquisition of fertilizing ability. Earlier studies showed that a mouse sperm DF binds to a receptor, DF-R, whose attachment to the sperm plasma membrane appears to involve a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPl) anchor. In the present study, purification and subsequent sequencing of DF-R has identified this similar to 23 kDa protein as phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein 1 (PEBP 1). To obtain functional evidence that supports sequence homology data, purified recombinant PEBP 1 and PEBP 2 were evaluated for biological activity. While PEBP 1 was able to remove DF activity in solution at concentrations above similar to 1 nmol/l, PEBP 2 was ineffective, even at 600 nmol/l; this confirmed that DF-R is PEBP 1. Anti-PEBP 1 antiserum recognized recombinant PEBP 1 and a similar to 23 kDa protein in both mouse and human sperm lysates. Immunolocalization studies revealed that DF-R/PEBP 1 is located on the acrosomal cap, the post-acrosomal region and the flagellum of both mouse and human spermatozoa, with epitope accessibility being capacitation state-dependent and reversible. Treatment of cells with a phospholipase able to cleave GPl anchors essentially abolished immunostaining, thus confirming the extracellular location of DF-R/PEBP 1. We suggest that DF-R/PEBP 1 plays its fundamental role in capacitation by causing alterations in the sperm plasma membrane in both head and flagellum, with functional consequences for membrane-associated proteins. Obtaining more detail about DF <-> DF-R interactions could lead to useful applications in both fertility treatments and new contraceptive approaches.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据