4.1 Article

Plasma concentrations of generic lopinavir/ritonavir in HIV type-1-infected individuals

期刊

ANTIVIRAL THERAPY
卷 14, 期 7, 页码 1001-1004

出版社

INT MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.3851/IMP1410

关键词

-

资金

  1. Government Pharmaceutical Organization (GPO), Bangkok, Thailand [NCT00802334]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Generic drugs can contribute to access to treatment for HIV-infected patients. However quality and safety remains an issue of concern. Therefore, we evaluated minimal plasma concentrations and short-term safety of a generic lopinavir/ritonavir 200/50 ring tablet formulation. Methods: In a single-centre prospective pilot study, patients receiving protease-inhibitor-based antiretroviral treatment were switched to a generic lopinavir/ritonavir tablet at the standard dose (400/100 mg twice daily). Minimum drug concentrations (C(min)) of lopinavir and ritonavir were performed before switching (in 16 patients who were on Kaletra(R) soft-gel capsules) and after 4 weeks (in all patients). Plasma levels of lopinavir and ritonavir were determined by a validated HPLC method. Either the Wilcoxon signed-rank or Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the groups. Results: A total of 37 patients (18 females) were included in the study. Two stopped their study medications prematurely because of intolerance. The median (interquartile range) lopinavir C(min) in was 7.2 mg/I (5.8-8.3) and no patients had subtherapeutic levels <1.0 mg/I. No significant difference of lopinavir C(min) levels was found between Kaletra(R), and the generic product (P=0.224). By contrast, the C(min) of generic ritonavir was higher (P=0.012). Food did not affect the drug levels. Mild gastrointestinal complaints were reported in 12 patients. Conclusions: The generic lopinavir/ritonavir tablet showed C(min) plasma concentrations similar to what is described for the branded product, with good stability, independent of food intake. These data support the efforts in scaling up access to generic second-line treatment in middle- and low-income countries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据